Search "user:IndigoEngun"

Sometimes the move that's preferred by the engine or the move that leads to the shorter checkmate may also lead to much trickier positions. Because the shorter checkmate may involve getting into a dif…

This is an artifact of the engine running at too low a depth, but it wouldn't be an issue if the general issue of flagging completely winining moves as inaccuracies was fixed. See this old thread of m…

Games against the Lichess AI should be made to not count for the "doesn't complete games" counters, if they actually do currently.

Bumps are not useful. But the suggestion is good.

@justaz said in #12: > You might be conflating volatility and deviation, at least in Glicko-2 terminology. I was not. Glicko deviation is about how uncertain the rating is. It mostly makes sense for a…

As a computer chess aficionado, I have long been thinking about the disadvantages of the incremental rating methods used for human play (in chess and in other games). The assumption of strength not ch…

This has been brought up several times in the past with no reaction from Lichess. Nonetheless, I support this motion. This, and quick-play, are the two most needed things to improve the chess960 playi…

The only kind of sensible way to abolish draws by repetition would be to make repetition illegal (and if your only otherwise legal moves would be repetitions, you lose). This would change the nature o…

Game 1 is really.... bizarre. How does the selection work to get these 4 games to pick a winner from?

Zero draws. Only losses. The engine is much weaker in bullet, but humans lose much more strength in bullet than engines do. The engine is basically impossible to flag and will punish passive moves mad…